Peripheral Vascular Interventions Research Articles

The MULAN Trial - RCT on the use of MUsic in Cath-Lab to reduce ANxiety during peripheral vascular interventions.

Background: The purpose was to analyze the use of classical music to reduce procedure-related anxiety while conducting percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in patients with peripheral artery disease. Patients and methods: A total of 155 patients were analyzed in this single center randomized controlled trial. Procedure-related anxiety was assessed by a numerical rating scale (NRS, 0-10) and by recording of physiological parameters at three different points in time. A survey was conducted after the intervention. Results: This study showed that the patients listened to music overcame their procedure-related anxiety more quickly than the patients in the control group. The NRS at second timepoint was significantly reduced in intervention group compared to control group (p<0.01; r=0.2). Most participants stated that they would like to listen to music during possible future interventions. Conclusions: Classical music during endovascular interventions reduced procedure-related anxiety measured as greater reduction in NRS values in intervention group as well as in results of questionnaire performed post procedurally in PAD patients.

Real World Application of WIfI Scores in Peripheral Arterial Disease Patients

The Society for Vascular Surgery wound, ischemia, and foot infection (WIfI) classification system aims to risk stratify patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI), predicting both amputation rates and the need for revascularization. However, real-world utilization of the system and whether it accurately predicts outcomes following open revascularization and peripheral interventions is unclear. Therefore, we sought to determine the adoption of the WIfI classification system within a contemporary statewide collaborative as well as the impact of patient factor, and WIfI risk assessment on short- and long-term outcomes. Using data from a large statewide collaborative, we identified patients with CLTI undergoing open surgical revascularization or peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) between 2016 - 2022. The primary exposure was preoperative clinical WIfI stage. Patients were categorized according to the SVS Lower Extremity Threatened Limb Classification System into clinical WIfI stages1, 2, 3, or 4. The primary outcomes were 30-day and 1-year amputation and mortality. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to estimate the association of WIfI stage on post-revascularization outcomes. In the cohort of 17,417 patients, 83.4% (n=14,529) had WIfI stage documented. Peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs) were performed on 57.6% of patients, and 42.4% underwent an open surgical revascularization (OSR). 49.5% of patients were classified as stage 1, 19.3% stage 2, 12.8% stage 3 and 18.3% of patients met stage 4 criteria. Stage 3 and 4 patients had higher rates of diabetes, congestive heart failure, and renal failure, and were less likely to be current or former smokers. One-half of stage 3 patients underwent OSR, while stage 1 patients were most likely to have received a PVI (64%). As WIfI stage increased from 1 to 4, 1-year mortality increased from 12% to 21% (p<0.001), 30-day amputation rates increased from 5% to 38% (p<0.001), and 1-year amputation rates increased from 15% to 55% (p<0.001). Finally, patients who did not have WIfI scores classified had significantly higher 30-day and 1-year mortality, as well as higher 30-day and 1-year amputation rates. The Society for Vascular Surgery WIfI clinical stage is significantly associated with 1-year amputation rates in patients with CLTI following lower extremity revascularization. As nearly 55% of stage 4 patients require a major amputation within one year of intervention, this study supports use of the WIfI classification system in clinical decision making for patients with CLTI.

C-78 | Trends in peripheral vascular interventions through pandemic and controversy: an analysis of the changes in modality, setting, and disparities in treatment from 2016 to 2023

C-78 | Trends in peripheral vascular interventions through pandemic and controversy: an analysis of the changes in modality, setting, and disparities in treatment from 2016 to 2023

F-10 | Predictors of Adverse Events Following Endovascular Revascularization of Acute Limb Ischemia: Outcomes of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Peripheral Vascular Intervention Registry

F-10 | Predictors of Adverse Events Following Endovascular Revascularization of Acute Limb Ischemia: Outcomes of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Peripheral Vascular Intervention Registry

Clinician perspectives regarding CYP2C19 genotype testing in patients with critical limb ischemia: A Delphi approach.

Antiplatelet therapy is an essential element in the management of patients with arterial vascular disease. In peripheral arterial disease (PAD), dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), primarily clopidogrel and aspirin, is routinely prescribed following intervention. There is sparse data regarding the need for DAPT, the appropriate duration, or the heterogeneity of treatment effects for antiplatelet regimens across patients, leading to potential uncertainty and heterogeneity around treatment practices. An example of heterogeneity of treatment effects is a patients' metabolizer status for the use of clopidogrel. The aim of the study was to (1) assess clinicians' knowledge of and attitudes toward managing patients with CYP2C19 mutations, (2) identify barriers to implementation of CYP2C19 testing and management policies, and (3) reach consensus for CYP2C19 testing and management strategies for patients with PAD who undergo peripheral vascular interventions (PVI). A modified Delphi method was used to establish consensus amongst PAD interventionalists around CYP2C19 testing. All practicing Yale New Haven Hospital PAD interventionalists with backgrounds in interventional cardiology, vascular surgery, or interventional radiology were approached by email for participation. Round 1 included the collection of baseline demographic questions, knowledge questions, and three statements for consensus. Knowledge questions were rated on a 0-10 Likert scale with the following anchors: 0 ("Not at all"), 5 ("Neutral), and 10 ("Very Much"). Participants were asked to rate the importance of the three consensus statements on a 9-point Likert scale from 1 ("Strongly Disagree") to 10 ("Strongly Agree"). In Round 2, participants were shown the same consensus statements, the median response of the group from the previous round, and their previous answers. Participants were instructed to revise their rating using the results from the previous round. This process was repeated for Round 3. Of the 28 experts invited to participate, 13 agreed (46%). Participants were predominantly male (92.3%) and white (61.5%) with representation from interventional cardiology (46.2%) and vascular surgery (53.8%). Most participants reported more than 10+ years in practice (61.5%). PAD interventionalists felt they would benefit from more education regarding CYP2C19 mutations (median score 8.0, interquartile range 5.0-8.5). They indicated some familiarity with CYP2C19 mutations (7.0, 6.0-9.5) but did not feel strongly that CYP2C19 was important to their practice (6.0, 5.5-7.5). In each round, the median responses for the three consensus statements were 5, 6, and 9, respectively. With each successive round the interquartile range narrowed indicative of evolving consensus but did not reach the prespecified interquartile range for consensus of 1 for any of the statements. PAD interventionalists practicing at an academic health system recognize the heterogenous response of their patients to clopidogrel therapy but are unsure when to leverage genetic testing to improve outcomes for their patients. Our study identified gaps regarding PAD interventionalists' knowledge, perceived barriers, and attitudes toward CYP2C19 testing in PAD. This information highlights the need for randomized data on genetic testing for clopidogrel responsiveness in peripheral vascular disease following intervention to help guide antiplatelet management.

Anticoagulation in Patients with Premature Peripheral Artery Disease Undergoing Lower Extremity Revascularization

ObjectivesPremature peripheral artery disease (PAD), defined by lower extremity revascularization (LER) at age ≤ 50 years, is associated with poor major adverse limb events. The early onset of disease is thought to be influenced by genetic factors that regulate homeostasis of the vascular wall and coagulation. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of anticoagulation as an adjunct to antiplatelet therapy on the outcomes of LER in patients with premature PAD. MethodsThere were 8,804 patients with premature PAD on pre- and post-operative antiplatelet therapy only and 1,236 patients on pre- and post-operative anticoagulation plus antiplatelet therapy in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) peripheral vascular intervention, infra-, and suprainguinal files. Propensity score matching (2:1) was performed between patients with premature PAD who were on antiplatelet therapy and those on anticoagulation plus antiplatelet therapy. Perioperative and one-year outcomes were analyzed including reintervention, major amputation, and mortality. ResultsPatients on anticoagulation were more likely to have coronary artery disease (48.7% vs 41.2%, P<.001), congestive heart failure (20.2% vs 13.1%, P<.001), and have undergone prior LER (73.9% vs 49.2%, P<.001) compared to patients on antiplatelet therapy only. They were also less likely to be independently ambulatory (74.2% vs 81.8%, P<.001) and be on a statin medication (66.8% vs 74.3%, P<.001) compared to patients on antiplatelet therapy only. Patients on anticoagulation were also less likely to be treated for claudication (38.1% vs 48.6%, P<.001), and less likely to be treated with an endovascular procedure (64.8% vs 73.8%, P<.001). After matching for baseline characteristics, there were 1,256 patients on antiplatelet therapy only and 628 patients on anticoagulation. Patients on anticoagulation were more likely to require a return to the operating room (3.7% vs 1.6%, P<.001) and had higher perioperatively mortality (1.1% vs 0.3%, P=.032), but major amputation was not significantly different (1.8% vs 1.6%, P=.798) compared to patients on antiplatelet therapy alone. At one-year, amputation-free survival was higher in patients on antiplatelets only compared to patients on anticoagulation and antiplatelet medications (87.5% vs 80.9%, log-rank P=.001). ConclusionAnticoagulation in addition to antiplatelet therapy in patients with premature PAD undergoing lower extremity revascularization is associated with increased reintervention and mortality at one year.

20 Characteristics of Medicare patients receiving peripheral vascular interventions for peripheral artery disease differ by outpatient site of service

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Endovascular peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs) are increasingly utilized for the treatment of peripheral artery disease (PAD). We aimed to assess characteristics of patients receiving PVI at ambulatory surgical centers and office-based labs (ASC/OBL) versus the outpatient hospital (hospital) site of service. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We performed a retrospective analysis using 100% Medicare fee-for-service claims data between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2022. We used Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes to identify patients undergoing angioplasty, stenting, or atherectomy. Patient demographics were collected from the Medicare Master Beneficiary Summary File and associated comorbidities and PVI indications were identified using International Classification of Disease (ICD)-10 codes. We used patient ZIP codes to determine patients’ residence densities and regions. We used site of service codes to determine whether PVI were performed in the ASC/OBL versus hospital. Results were analyzed with descriptive statistics. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Of 817,241 patients undergoing PVI for PAD, 461,068 (56.4%) were treated in an ASC/OBL. Compared to patients treated in the hospital, patients receiving PVI at ASC/OBLs were more likely to be older, female, non-white race, with fewer comorbidities (end stage renal disease, diabetes, hypertension, and any history of tobacco use) (all, P&lt;0.001). Patients treated in ASC/OBLs more frequently resided in urban (vs. rural) locations, and in the South and West (both, P&lt;0.001). Indication for PVI was predominately chronic limb-threatening ischemia, and clinically similar between groups (77.1% vs. 76.2%). There was a significant change in site of service over time: a minority (47.6%) of PVIs were performed in the ASC/OBL in 2017, whereas the majority (64.7%) of PVIs were performed in the ASC/OBL in 2022 (P&lt;0.001). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Patients treated in ASC/OBLs were less medically complex compared to those treated in the outpatient hospital setting. Further study is needed to examine whether differences in patient characteristics versus other factors (e.g. reimbursement) are driving the increase in PVIs performed in the ASC/OBL over time.

Comparison of mortality and amputation after lower extremity bypass versus peripheral vascular intervention in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia and comorbid chronic kidney disease

ObjectiveComorbid chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with worse outcomes for patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). However, comparative effectiveness data are limited for lower extremity bypass (LEB) vs peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) in patients with CLTI and CKD. We aimed to evaluate (1) 30-day all-cause mortality and amputation and (2) 5-year all-cause mortality and amputation for LEB vs PVI in patients with comorbid CKD. MethodsIndividuals who underwent LEB and PVI were queried from the Vascular Quality Initiative with Medicare claims-linked outcomes data. Propensity scores were calculated using 13 variables, and a 1:1 matching method was used. The mortality risk at 30 days and 5 years in LEB vs PVI by CKD was assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models, with interaction terms added for CKD. For amputation, cumulative incidence functions and Fine-Gray models were used to account for the competing risk of death, with interaction terms for CKD added. ResultsOf 4084 patients (2042 per group), the mean age was 71.0 ± 10.8 years, and 69.0% were male. Irrespective of CKD status, 30-day mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.63-1.42, P = .78) was similar for LEB vs PVI, but LEB was associated with a lower risk of 30-day amputation (sub-HR [sHR]: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.44-0.97, P = .04). CKD status, however, did not modify these results. Similarly, LEB vs PVI was associated with a lower risk of 5-year mortality (HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.71-0.88, P < .001) but no difference in 5-year amputation (sHR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.89-1.20, P = .67). CKD status did not modify these results. ConclusionsRegardless of CKD status, patients had a lower risk of 5-year all-cause mortality and 30-day amputation with LEB vs PVI. Results may help inform preference-sensitive treatment decisions on LEB vs PVI for patients with CLTI and CKD, who may commonly be deemed too high risk for surgery.

Outcomes of Endovascular Intervention for Atherosclerotic Lesions Confined to the Popliteal Artery

Most surgeons employ an endovascular first approach to the treatment of peripheral arterial disease (PAD), but controversy remains regarding the ideal interventions for the management of isolated popliteal artery disease (IPAD). Indeed, there are a paucity of data that compare outcomes of popliteal stents versus other peripheral vascular interventions (PVI). The goal of this study was to evaluate outcomes of PVI in IPAD. The Vascular Study Group of New England database was queried for all IPAD PVI performed for atherosclerotic occlusive disease from 2010-2021. Those with at least one year of follow-up data available were included for analysis. The primary endpoint was one-year freedom from a composite target lesion (TL) treatment failure that included re-stenosis >50% on duplex, re-intervention, or ipsilateral major amputation. We included 689 procedures performed on 634 patients. 250 (36.3%) were treated with plain balloons (POBA), 215 (31.2%) had stents, 170 (24.7%) had special balloons (drug-coated, cutting, or lithotripsy), and 54 (7.8%) atherectomies were performed. Stent placement was associated with lower freedom from TL treatment failure (72.6%) than special balloon (81.2%, p=0.048) and atherectomy (88.9%, p=0.012), but not POBA (76.8%, p=0.293). On multivariable logistic regression, stents (OR 0.637, p=0.021) and pre-operative P2Y12 inhibitor therapy (OR 0.683, p=0.048) were both associated with lower freedom from intervention failure. Popliteal stent placement is associated with a higher rate of TL treatment failure at 1 year when compared with other PVI including special balloon angioplasty and atherectomy, but not POBA, and should therefore be avoided in favor of special balloons or atherectomy whenever feasible.

Long-term patient-reported outcomes among patients undergoing revascularization vs medical therapy for intermittent claudication

ObjectiveSociety for Vascular Surgery guidelines recommend revascularization for patients with intermittent claudication (IC) if it can improve patient function and quality of life. However, it is still unclear if patients with IC achieve a significant functional benefit from surgery compared with medical management alone. This study examines the relationship between IC treatment modality (operative vs nonoperative optimal medical management) and patient-reported outcomes for physical function (PROMIS-PF) and satisfaction in social roles and activities (PROMIS-SA). MethodsWe identified patients with IC who presented for index evaluation in a vascular surgery clinic at an academic medical center between 2016 and 2021. Patients were stratified based on whether they underwent a revascularization procedure during follow-up vs continued nonoperative management with medication and recommended exercise therapy. We used linear mixed-effect models to assess the relationship between treatment modality and PROMIS-PF, PROMIS-SA, and ankle-brachial index (ABI) over time, clustering among repeat patient observations. Models were adjusted for age, sex, diabetes, Charlson Comorbidity Index, Clinical Frailty Score, tobacco use, and index ABI. ResultsA total of 225 patients with IC were identified, of which 40% (n = 89) underwent revascularization procedures (42% bypass; 58% peripheral vascular intervention) and 60% (n = 136) continued nonoperative management. Patients were followed up to 6.9 years, with an average follow-up of 5.2 ± 1.6 years. Patients who underwent revascularization were more likely to be clinically frail (P = .03), have a lower index ABI (0.55 ± 0.24 vs 0.72 ± 0.28; P < .001), and lower baseline PROMIS-PF score (36.72 ± 8.2 vs 40.40 ± 6.73; P = .01). There were no differences in patient demographics or medications between treatment groups. Examining patient-reported outcome trends over time; there were no significant differences in PROMIS-PF between groups, trends over time, or group differences over time after adjusting for covariates (P = .07, P = .13, and P =.08, respectively). However, all patients with IC significantly increased their PROMIS-SA over time (adjusted P = .019), with patients managed nonoperatively more likely to have an improvement in PROMIS-SA over time than those who underwent revascularization (adjusted P = .045). ConclusionsPatient-reported outcomes associated with functional status and satisfaction in activities are similar for patients with IC for up to 7 years, irrespective of whether they undergo treatment with revascularization or continue nonoperative management. These findings support conservative long-term management for patients with IC.

Atherectomy – The Options, the Evidence, and When Should It Be Used

The use of atherectomy for peripheral vascular interventions (PVI) has increased exponentially and reached 18% of all PVI in the United States. The theoretical benefit on extensive arterial calcification relies on the concept of plaque modification and removal instead of displacement, as with other endovascular techniques. To date, there are no prospective studies comparing the different atherectomy technologies (directional, rotational, orbital, and laser). Moreover, most related prospective comparative studies have a small number of patients, and larger studies are single arm in patients with relatively mild to moderate disease burden. While available literature shows lower dissection risk and reduced bailout stenting, the superiority of this technology compared to other endovascular techniques has yet to be proven. Despite the lack of level 1 evidence to support its superiority, the lucrative reimbursement fueled the overuse of this technology as first-line therapy, particularly in office-based laboratories and ambulatory surgery centers. The use of atherectomy ought to be selective and complementary to other endovascular technologies, and individualized patient-level decision-making based on the practitioner’s preference and expertise is essential to selectively incorporate atherectomy in managing complex atherosclerotic lesions.

Radial Artery Access for Peripheral Vascular Interventions: A Review of the Literature

ObjectivePercutaneous radial artery access for lower extremity arterial interventions has increased in popularity in recent years. The purpose of this review is to summarize available data regarding its safety and efficacy. MethodsStudies related to the use of the percutaneous radial artery access for peripheral artery intervention were identified in a search of the PubMed database. Outcomes evaluated were access complications and technical success. ResultsThirteen studies that evaluated patients undergoing percutaneous radial artery access with peripheral interventions were reviewed. Several studies were able to demonstrate use of up to 8Fr sheath; however, the majority was 6Fr. Reported rates of asymptomatic radial artery occlusion ranged up to 16% and reported radial artery access site complication rate ranged from 0-15.6%. Technical success ranged from 74%-98.7%. ConclusionsPercutaneous radial artery access can effectively and safely be used in select patients.

Comparative Outcomes of Peripheral Vascular Interventions in Patients on Chronic Anticoagulation with Factor Xa Inhibitors and Vitamin K Antagonists

In patients undergoing revascularization for peripheral arterial disease (PAD), low-dose Factor Xa inhibitors (FXaI) taken with aspirin improved limb and cardiovascular outcomes compared to aspirin alone. Furthermore, in atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism, FXaI are recommended over vitamin K antagonists (VKA) for chronic anticoagulation. While studies have evaluated different perioperative anticoagulation regimens in patients treated for PAD, the optimal regimen for chronic anticoagulation in patients with PAD undergoing peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) has not been determined. This analysis compares outcomes of patients after PVI that require chronic anticoagulation with FXaI and VKA. The Vascular Quality Initiative-PVI database was used. Patients consistently treated with FXaI or VKA before the procedure, at discharge, and on long-term follow-up were defined as those receiving chronic anticoagulation. Patient demographics, procedural details, and perioperative and long-term outcomes were compared between FXaI and VKA groups. A total of 109,268 patients were analyzed, and 6,885 were chronically anticoagulated with FXaI (N=2,427) or VKA (N=4,458). Patients anticoagulated with VKA were more frequently males (65.3% vs. 61.0%, P<0.001) with end-stage renal disease (9.7% vs. 4.6%, P<0.001) and more likely to be treated for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (58.1% vs. 52.7%, P<0.001). Rates of hematoma following PVI were significantly higher in patients taking VKA compared to FXaI (3.5% vs. 1.9%, P<0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that VKA were associated with increased perioperative hematoma than FXaI (odds ratio=1.89 [1.30-2.82]). Compared to patients taking VKA, those receiving FXaI had lower rates of major amputation (6.7% vs. 8.4%, P=0.020) and mortality (7.6% vs. 15.2%, P ≤ 0.001). Using Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients consistently anticoagulated with FXaI had improved amputation-free survival after PVI. Adjusting for significant patient and procedural characteristics, Cox proportional hazard regression demonstrated that there is an increased risk for major amputation or mortality in patients using VKA compared to FXaI (hazard ratio 1.61, [1.36-1.90]). Chronic anticoagulation with FXaI as compared to VKA was associated with superior perioperative and long-term outcomes in patients with PAD undergoing PVI. FXaI should be the preferred agents over VKA for chronic anticoagulation in patients with PAD undergoing PVI.

Long-term outcomes in the smoking claudicant after peripheral vascular interventions

ObjectiveEmphasis on tobacco cessation, given the urgent and emergent nature of vascular surgery, is less prevalent than standard elective cases such as hernia repairs, cosmetic surgery, and bariatric procedures. The goal of this study is to determine the effect of active smoking on claudicating individuals undergoing peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs). Our goal is to determine if a greater emphasis on education should be placed on smoking cessation in nonurgent cases scheduled through clinic visits and not the Emergency Department. MethodsThis study was performed using the multi-institution de-identified Vascular Quality Initiative/Medicare-linked database (Vascular Implant Surveillance and Interventional Outcomes Network [VISION]). Claudicants who underwent PVI for peripheral arterial occlusive disease between 2004 and 2019 were included in our study. Our final sample consisted of a total of 18,726 patients: 3617 nonsmokers (19.3%) (NSs), 9975 former smokers (53.3%) (FSs), and 5134 current smokers (27.4%) (CSs). We performed propensity score matching on 29 variables (age, gender, race, ethnicity, treatment setting [outpatient or inpatient], obesity, insurance, hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, previous coronary artery bypass graft, carotid endarterectomy, major amputation, inflow treatment, prior bypass or PVI, preoperative medications, level of treatment, concomitant endarterectomy, and treatment type [atherectomy, angioplasty, stent]) between NS vs FS and FS vs CS. Outcomes were long-term (5-year) overall survival (OS), limb salvage (LS), freedom from reintervention (FR), and amputation-free survival (AFS). ResultsPropensity score matching resulted in 3160 well-matched pairs of NS and FS and 3750 well-matched pairs of FS and CS. There was no difference between FS and NS in terms of OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-1.09; P = .43), FR (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.89-1.04; P = .35), or AFS (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.79-1.03; P = .12). However, when compared with CS, we found FS to have a higher OS (HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.04-1.33; P = .01), less FR (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.83-0.96; P = .003), and greater AFS (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.03-1.31; P = .01). ConclusionsThis multi-institutional Medicare-linked study looking at elective PVI cases in patients with peripheral artery disease presenting with claudication found that FSs have similar 5-year outcomes in comparison to NSs in terms of OS, FR, and AFS. Additionally, CSs have lower OS and AFS when compared with FSs. Overall, this suggests that smoking claudicants should be highly encouraged and referred to structured smoking cessation programs or even required to stop smoking prior to elective PVI due to the perceived 5-year benefit.

Short-term outcomes of endovascular management of acute limb ischemia using aspiration mechanical thrombectomy.

Management of acute limb ischemia (ALI) has seen greater utilization of catheter-based interventions over the last two decades. Data on their efficacy is largely based on comparisons of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) and open thrombectomy. During this time, many adjuncts to CDT have emerged with different mechanisms of action, including pharmacomechanical thrombolysis (PMT) and aspiration mechanical thrombectomy (AMT). However, the safety and efficacy of newer adjuncts like AMT have not been well established. This study is a retrospective analysis of the contemporary management of ALI comparing patients treated with aspiration mechanical thrombectomy to patients treated with the more established CDT adjunct, pharmacomechanical thrombolysis. Patients undergoing peripheral endovascular intervention for ALI using an adjunctive device were identified through query of the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) Peripheral Vascular Intervention (PVI) module from 2014 to 2019. Patients with a nonviable extremity (Rutherford ALI Stage 3), prior history of ipsilateral major amputation, popliteal aneurysm, procedures that were deemed elective (>72h from admission), procedures that did not utilize an endovascular adjunctive device, and patients without short-term follow-up were all excluded from analysis. The primary outcome was a composite outcome of freedom from major amputation and/or death in the perioperative time period. We identified 528 patients with Rutherford ALI Stage 1 or 2 who were treated with an endovascular adjunct. 433 patients did not undergo aspiration mechanical thrombectomy (no AMT group) and 95 patients did undergo aspiration mechanical thrombectomy (AMT group). The amputation-free survival across all patients was 93.4%. There were significant differences in demographic, comorbidity, and treatment variables between groups (e.g., gender, prior percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), history of prior peripheral artery disease intervention, and history of prior infra-inguinal PVI), so a propensity score matched analysis was included to account for these group differences. In the propensity score matched analysis, there was no significant difference in major amputation (AMT 7.4% vs no AMT 3.2%, p = 0.13) or death (AMT 95.8% survival vs no AMT 98.4% survival, p = 0.23) with the use of aspiration mechanical thrombectomy. However, there was significantly worse amputation-free survival with the use of aspiration mechanical thrombectomy (AMT 88.4% vs no AMT 95.3%, p = 0.03). On multivariate analysis, prior supra-inguinal bypass (OR 4.85, 1.70-13.84, p = 0.003), Rutherford ALI Stage 2B (OR 3.13, 1.47-6.67, p = 0.003), and aspiration mechanical thrombectomy (OR 2.71, 1.03-7.17, p = 0.05) were associated with the composite outcome. Short-term amputation-free survival rates of endovascular management of acute limb ischemia are adequate across all modalities. However, aspiration mechanical thrombectomy was associated with significantly worse amputation-free survival compared to other endovascular adjuncts alone (i.e., pharmacomechanical thrombolysis). Severe limb ischemia (Rutherford ALI Stage 2B) and prior supra-inguinal bypass were associated with worse amputation-free survival regardless of the choice of endovascular intervention.

The Use and Impact of Cilostazol on Patients Undergoing Endovascular Peripheral Interventions

ObjectivesCilostazol is used for the treatment of intermittent claudication. The impact of cilostazol on the outcomes of peripheral vascular interventions (PVI) remains controversial. This study assesses the use and impact of cilostazol on patients undergoing PVI for peripheral arterial disease (PAD). MethodsThe Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) database files for PVI were reviewed. Patients with PAD who underwent PVI for CLTI or claudication were included and divided based on the use of cilostazol preoperatively. After propensity matching for patient demographics and comorbidities, the short-term and long-term outcomes of the two groups (preoperative cilostazol use versus no pre-operative cilostazol use) were compared. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine outcomes. ResultsA total of 245,309 patients underwent PVI procedures and 6.6% (N=16,366) were on cilostazol prior to intervention. Patients that received cilostazol were more likely to be male (62% vs 60%; P < .001), White (77% vs 75%; P < .001), and smokers (83% vs 77%; P < .001). They were less likely to have diabetes mellitus (50% vs 56%; P < .001) and congestive heart failure (14% vs 23%; P < .001). Patient on cilostazol were more likely to be treated for claudication (63% vs 40%, P < .001), undergo prior lower extremity revascularization (55% vs 51%, P<.001) and less likely to have undergone prior minor and major amputation (10% vs 19%; P < .001) compared to patients who did not receive cilostazol. After 3:1 propensity matching, there were 50,265 patients included in the analysis with no differences in baseline characteristics. Patients on cilostazol were less likely to develop renal complications and more likely to be discharged home. Patients on cilostazol had significantly lower rates of long-term mortality (11.5% vs 13.4%, P <.001 and major amputation (4.0% vs 4.7%, P=0.022). However, there were no significant differences in rates of reintervention, major adverse limb events, or patency after PVI. Amputation-free survival rates were significantly higher for patients on cilostazol, after four years of follow-up (89% vs 87%, P=0.03). ConclusionCilostazol is underutilized in the VQI database and seems to be associated with improved amputation-free survival. Cilostazol therapy should be considered in all patients with PAD who can tolerate it prior to PVI.

Evaluation of short-term mortality in patients with Medicare undergoing endovascular interventions for chronic limb-threatening ischemia.

Patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) have high mortality rates after revascularization. Risk stratification for short-term outcomes is challenging. We aimed to develop machine-learning models to rank predictive variables for 30-day and 90-day all-cause mortality after peripheral vascular intervention (PVI). Patients undergoing PVI for CLTI in the Medicare-linked Vascular Quality Initiative were included. Sixty-six preprocedural variables were included. Random survival forest (RSF) models were constructed for 30-day and 90-day all-cause mortality in the training sample and evaluated in the testing sample. Predictive variables were ranked based on the frequency that they caused branch splitting nearest the root node by importance-weighted relative importance plots. Model performance was assessed by the Brier score, continuous ranked probability score, out-of-bag error rate, and Harrell's C-index. A total of 10,114 patients were included. The crude mortality rate was 4.4% at 30 days and 10.6% at 90 days. RSF models commonly identified stage 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD), dementia, congestive heart failure (CHF), age, urgent procedures, and need for assisted care as the most predictive variables. For both models, eight of the top 10 variables were either medical comorbidities or functional status variables. Models showed good discrimination (C-statistic 0.72 and 0.73) and calibration (Brier score 0.03 and 0.10). RSF models for 30-day and 90-day all-cause mortality commonly identified CKD, dementia, CHF, need for assisted care at home, urgent procedures, and age as the most predictive variables as critical factors in CLTI. Results may help guide individualized risk-benefit treatment conversations regarding PVI.

Variability in guideline-directed medical therapy across sites and operators and long-term mortality and amputation outcomes risk in patients undergoing peripheral vascular interventions

The use of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in patients undergoing peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs) decreases the risk of death and amputation and may decrease hospital readmissions. The variability of GDMT prescription across sites and operators and the proportionality of risk is not well understood. We aimed to study the association between variability of GDMT prescription at the site and operator level and outcomes (including 90-day readmissions and 24-month all-cause mortality and major amputation). We examined GDMT discharge rates in PVIs performed between 2017 and 2018 using Medicare-linked Vascular Quality Initiative registry. GDMT included a statin, antiplatelet therapy, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (ACE-i/ARB) if hypertensive. Quartiles (Q1-4) of GDMT rates were documented by operators and sites and variability was quantified using median odds ratios (MOR) and intraclass correlation (ICC). The association between lower GDMT rates (per 10%) by sites and operators with 90-day readmission were calculated using logistic regression, and with 24-month mortality and major amputation using parametric survival model. Models were adjusted for patient-level factors and included sites and operators nested within sites as 2 random effects. GDMT rates for 17,147 patients across 223 sites and 1,263 operators ranged from 0% to 38% (Q1, MOR 1.43, 95%CI 1.39-1.47, P ≤ .001) to 57%-100% (Q4, MOR 1.48, 95%CI 1.44-1.51, P ≤ .001). Four percent of variance in GDMT use was explained by sites (ICC 3.9, 95%CI 2.9-5.3) and operators (ICC 4.1, 95%CI 3.1-5.4). A dose-response relationship was noted between lower GDMT rates and increased risk of 90-day readmission risk by sites (P = .021) and operators (P < .001). Lower GDMT prescription by site was associated with higher risk of 24-month mortality (HR = 1.07, 95%CI 1.02-1.13) and major amputation (HR = 1.08, 95%CI 1.01-1.15). Similar associations were found for GDMT use by provider (mortality HR = 1.05, 95%CI 1.02-1.08 and amputation HR = 1.04, 95%CI 1.00-1.08). Both at the operator and health system level, there was significant variability in GDMT prescription following PVI, proportionally translating into risk for readmission, mortality, and major amputation. Targeted quality efforts should prioritize both operator and site levels to improve GDMT use and outcomes for patients undergoing PVI.

Room for improvement in patient compliance during peripheral vascular interventions

BackgroundFor patients receiving procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA), patient cooperation is crucial, because patients remain continuously aware of operating room activity and can be asked to perform tasks, such as prolonged breath-holds. This survey aimed to collect information on patient compliance with on-table instructions and its relation to periprocedural outcomes from surgeons nationwide performing peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs) under PSA. MethodsA nine-question online survey was sent to 383 vascular surgeons (including both vascular surgery attendings and trainees) across the United States through REDCap from August 30 to September 21, 2021, with responses closed on October 30, 2021. The survey response was analyzed with descriptive statistics. ResultsThere were 83 (21.6%) vascular surgeons who responded to the survey, of who, 67 (80.7%) were attending vascular surgeons and 16 (19.3%) were vascular surgery trainees. Forty-one respondents (49.4%) performed 11 to 20 PVI cases under PSA every month, and 31 (41.0%) respondents performed 1 to 10 PVI cases under PSA every month. Forty-one respondents (49.4%) reported that in 1% to 10% of their cases, additional contrast and/or radiation was administered because patient moved on the table or did not cooperate with breath-holds; 25 (30.1%) reported that this occurred in 11% to 20% of their cases, 12 (14.5%) reported that this occurred in 21% to 50% of their cases, and 4 (4.8%) reported that this occurred in >50% of their cases. In such cases, the majority of respondents reported a 1% to 10% increase in contrast volume (59.0%), radiation dosage (62.7%), sedative/analgesia administration (46.3%), and procedural time (54.9%). Of cases being converted to general anesthesia owing to inadequate patient cooperation, 35 (42.2%) respondents reported between 1 and 5 cases per month and 3 (3.6%) respondents reported between 6 and 10 cases per month. Of cases being aborted owing to inadequate patient cooperation, 25 respondents (30.1%) reported between 1 and 5 cases per month, and 1 (1.2%) respondent reported between 6 and 10 cases per month. ConclusionsA significant fraction of PVI cases performed under PSA result in increased radiation and contrast exposure, sedative administration, and procedural time owing to inadequate patient cooperation. In certain cases, conversion to general anesthesia or case abortion is required. Further research should be performed to investigate strategies to minimize such adverse patient safety events.

Intravascular ultrasound use in peripheral arterial and deep venous interventions: Multidisciplinary expert opinion from SCAI/AVF/AVLS/SIR/SVM/SVS

Percutaneous revascularization is the primary strategy for treating lower extremity venous and arterial disease. Angiography is limited by its ability to accurately size vessels, precisely determine the degree of stenosis and length of lesions, characterize lesion morphology, or correctly diagnose postintervention complications. These limitations are overcome with use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). IVUS has demonstrated the ability to improve outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention, and there is increasing evidence to support its benefits in the setting of peripheral vascular intervention. At this stage in its evolution, there remains a need to standardize the use and approach to peripheral vascular IVUS imaging. This manuscript represents considerations and consensus perspectives that emerged from a roundtable discussion including 15 physicians with expertise in interventional cardiology, interventional radiology, and vascular surgery, representing 6 cardiovascular specialty societies, held on February 3, 2023. The roundtable’s aims were to assess the current state of lower extremity revascularization, identify knowledge gaps and need for evidence, and determine how IVUS can improve care and outcomes for patients with peripheral arterial and deep venous pathology.